As solar and wind power rise, fossil fuels face chaos, calamity and collapse
World | Gwynne Dyer | Dec. 16, 2021
The “new normal”, said International Energy Agency spokesperson Heymi Bahar last May, may be a far faster expansion of renewable energy than expected, driven mainly by market forces. So fast, in fact, that it raises a different kind of risk (but he didn’t mention that).
The good news is big and undeniable. There has been a step-change in the growth of wind and solar power, which jumped by 45 per cent worldwide in 2020 — and despite the pandemic, this year’s growth will be even higher.
Even more important, hardly any other source of energy is growing at all.
The old pattern was that the global economy grew by around three per cent a year, and the demand for electricity grew a little bit faster. Renewables (mainly hydro but some solar and wind) grew at around the same rate, but the share of renewables was not rising at all. And it was only 15 per cent of total electricity generation, compared to 85 per cent for fossil fuels and nuclear.
That’s why the overall global emissions of carbon dioxide have not been shrinking. Indeed, they have grown every year since global heating was identified as a problem and are now around 40 per cent higher than they were in 1990. There was no hope of cutting emissions until non-fossil energy sources were being produced in volume to take up the slack.
Never mind the campaigns of denial and doubt about climate change that were funded by the fossil fuel industry. They did some damage, no doubt, but coal, gas and oil still ruled mainly because the non-fossil alternatives that did exist were unable to expand further (like hydro) or were significantly more expensive (like nuclear, wind and solar).
Now that has all changed. Over the past decade the ‘levelized’ cost of renewable power has dropped by around 60 per cent (wind) and 80 per cent (solar), making both cheaper than fossil fuels in most places. The trend has been visible for years, but now it is being reflected in actual hardware.
The non-fossil share of electricity production, stuck at 15 per cent for so long, was 27 per cent in 2020. It will be 29 per cent in 2021 — and it will probably be 31 per cent next year. Solar accounts for more than half of that amount, and wind for most of the rest. And the IEA estimates that renewables will make up 95 per cent of new power capacity globally between now and 2026.
If the share of renewables in total power generation is now growing at two per cent a year, what will it be in 2026? Forty per cent? And what might it be in 2030? Maybe 50 per cent. That would be a genuine revolution — with all the turmoil and upheaval that real revolutions involve.
Of course, many things could go wrong with this prediction. Soaring commodity and shipping prices are driving costs in the industry up sharply. For example, the price of polysilicon (used to make solar panels) has quadrupled since 2020. For some inputs like lithium and rare earths, there may even be a global shortage.
But costs are going up for rival sources of energy too, and so far renewables are retaining their price advantage. The question remains valid: what would happen if fossil fuels go into unexpectedly rapid decline, with around a third of their existing market vanishing by 2030 and most of the rest over that decade?
The very good thing that would happen is an equally rapid decline in global carbon dioxide emissions, maybe even fast enough to enable us to stay below the +1.5°C threshold of warming through the 2030s. That would save some tens of millions of lives and a few trillion dollars in avoided fire, flood and storm damage.
The less attractive result would be chaos in ‘sunset’ industries on which the Sun is going down much too fast: no time for retraining and gentle transitions, just collapse. One can see the parts of the car industry that didn’t turn electric fast enough going down that route, together with the entire coal industry.
The gas industry’s free pass as a less polluting ‘transitional’ fuel would evaporate, and the oil industry would split between the few very low-cost producers in the Gulf, who would stay in business by cutting their prices radically, and the rest, who would go to the wall. Then, around 2040, the remaining oil producers would go broke as well.
If you can’t get some geopolitical clashes out of that scenario, you’re not really trying. But it’s still the most promising scenario I have seen for a long time. If we can replace the world’s entire energy infrastructure in a single generation without even a major war or famine, I would gladly revise my views on the evolutionary fitness of the human race.